Holy heck, this is like when you get to the end of the maze and find out the maze itself has been battling you the whole time. Well guess what mother brain, I am not at the top of my game right now and I’m ready to tango.
I wrote the above attempting Thing 23 at the end of my marathon. I didn’t make it any further that day, but I think it’s funny so I’m leaving it.
Here are some concepts and hyphenated phrases that characterize web 2.0 for me:
- Two-way communication
- User-supplied content
- multimedia
- selectivity of content
- the hive mind
- programming that lets user do a wide variety of things using the same basic computer skills (browsing for an uploading a file, for instance)
I’m sure there’s more, but these are striking clearly for me. Two of the suggested articles gave me completely divergent perspectives on how this will affect libraries. To a temporary place in time… sort of climbs Maslow’s heirachy of needs but with libraries, although she compares it to a chain of increasing value. She suggests that libraries will evolve from what we know into something that every part of can be accessed online where we will increasingly spend our time, and then eventually the whole building will be a self-actualized portal to the web because of other mobile devices and technologies (like holograms!). On the other hand, Walt Crawford has the take that only the name “L 2.0″ is new, and the idea of collaboration and specialization has existed forever in the form of public meetings and Tell Us Slips, which are examples of “low tech 2.0″ services. He also takes the practical approach that we ought to think of 2.0 as evolution rather than revolution meaning that the technologies will enhance what we do rather than rebuild the whole system. These two ideas really bookend my thoughts as far as the principles of 2.0-ness is concerned. I have two original thoughts to add. First is that it’s important to view 2.0 as a social need and mode because not everyone is on the web, yet. This isn’t really an excuse for people who can’t afford computers, nor is it meant to justify resisting learning something new. I just think that for all it’s connective power, the internet keeps us separated by enabling us to communicate remotely. Did you IM your college roommate from across the room? I did. It was hilarious at the time, but when online talk (and increasingly smaller and more bite sized talk) replaces conversation, something is missed. Second, … I forget what it is….hmmm…. but you know what? I will take advantage of this format by not finishing now, and update later when I remember. Great! Just now, this second, web 2.0 capabilities and expectations have increased my productivity and functionality, even as I type! Word!
